Results are scattered
Prototype and engineering test results can be stored in different folders, databases, files, notebooks or rig-specific systems. This makes it difficult to compare anomalies across runs, products and time periods.
Test Data Management
Arc helps hardware teams turn fragmented prototype, engineering, field and early production test data into faster analysis, anomaly investigations and reports.
Engineering test data analysis is the process of collecting, structuring, analysing and reporting on prototype, validation, field and early production test results. For hardware start-ups and scale-ups, it connects test runs, measured values, configurations, anomalies and engineering notes so teams can make decisions faster.
Test data management is the process of collecting, structuring, analysing and reusing the results produced by engineering, validation and production test systems.
For hardware teams, test data often sits across prototype rigs, LabVIEW applications, TestStand sequences, Python scripts, CSV files, SQL exports, spreadsheets, local machines and manual reports. Each system may capture part of the picture, but teams still struggle to answer basic operational questions quickly:
Arc helps teams turn fragmented test outputs into a usable engineering evidence layer for analysis, anomaly investigation and reporting.
Test systems are usually built to run tests first and analyse data second. That creates problems as prototype, validation and early production work scales.
Prototype and engineering test results can be stored in different folders, databases, files, notebooks or rig-specific systems. This makes it difficult to compare anomalies across runs, products and time periods.
One test station may produce CSV files, another may write to a database, and another may generate PDF reports. Even when the tests are similar, the data structure may not be.
A result without product, prototype, configuration, limit, fixture, software version and run history is hard to use for root cause analysis.
Engineering, reliability and customer-facing teams often need evidence, not just summary dashboards. They need to know what happened, when, where and under which conditions.
Bring together prototype results, engineering runs, field logs and early production data so teams can see what changed across tests.
Identify abnormal measurements, failed runs, repeated symptoms, drift and configuration-specific patterns.
Connect test results to versions, configurations, limits, fixtures, timestamps, notes and report outputs.
Structure test data so engineering teams can query results, investigate anomalies and generate reports more effectively.
Arc is designed for teams with test data spread across systems such as:
Teams responsible for prototype learning, design validation, anomaly investigation and engineering decisions.
Teams building and maintaining test rigs, scripts, data pipelines and repeatable engineering test workflows.
Teams connecting field observations, returned-unit evidence, reliability runs and investigation notes.
Teams that need test results to understand design issues, supplier problems, product reliability, anomalies and field failures.
Manage production test results across stations, lines, products and retests.
ResourceTurn test results into insight across yield, failures, trends and quality issues.
ResourceConnect test records to products, serial numbers, limits, stations and quality evidence.
ResourceUse TestStand result data more effectively across production and quality workflows.
ResourceStructure LabVIEW outputs so teams can analyse, compare and reuse test results.
Manage PCBA, box-build, functional test, inspection and production quality data.
ResourceConnect test data to traceability, supplier quality, warranty risk and high-volume production.
ResourceSupport high-reliability test evidence, auditability, configuration control and qualification workflows.
ResourceCompare run history and quality evidence across regulated device manufacturing and test.
ResourceTrack test results across cells, modules, packs, BMS, end-of-line testing and quality workflows.
ResourceManage test data for sensors, controls, instrumentation, drives and rugged electronic products.
ResourceConnect test data to yield, binning, reliability, failure analysis and production quality workflows.
MES systems help manage manufacturing execution. QMS systems help manage quality processes. Engineering test data analysis focuses on the detailed results, configurations, anomalies, run history and evidence generated by test workflows. Manufacturing systems can remain useful later, but Arc starts with the engineering analysis layer teams need before production-line systems are mature.
Engineering test data analysis is the process of collecting, structuring, analysing and reporting on prototype, validation, field and early production test results.
Hardware engineering teams need test data management because prototype results, run logs, scripts, spreadsheets and reports are often scattered, making it difficult to compare runs, investigate anomalies and generate reports quickly.
No. MES manages manufacturing execution. Engineering test data analysis focuses on the detailed results, configurations, anomalies, run history and evidence produced by test workflows.
No. It can support production test, engineering validation, reliability testing, incoming inspection, supplier quality and customer evidence workflows.
Arc is designed for teams that generate test data from systems such as LabVIEW, TestStand and custom automated test environments.
The first step is to map where test data is created, how it is stored, what context is missing and which engineering questions the team cannot answer quickly today.
Bring a prototype or engineering test workflow and we’ll map where test results, scripts, spreadsheets and manual reports are slowing engineering decisions.
Request Access