Arc Skills / Technical management and design reviews
Prepare a test readiness review
Use Arc Skills to prepare a test readiness review for a defined article, procedure and campaign. The output checks whether the planned execution can safely produce valid evidence, with owner actions for configuration, instrumentation, criteria and recovery gaps.
Use this skill
Use Arc Skills to prepare a test readiness review.
Inputs:
- Test objectives, requirements and approved procedure
- Article, facility and instrumentation configurations
- Acceptance/abort criteria, data plan, anomalies and review criteria
Return a TRR readiness matrix, evidence index and pre-execution actions. Identify what affects safety, validity or coverage. Name owners and required closure evidence for conditional recommendations.What you provide and what you get
| What you have | How it is used | What you get |
|---|---|---|
| Requirements, objectives and procedure | Check intended coverage | Acceptance and procedure findings |
| Article, facility and instruments | Check readiness and identity | Configuration and calibration actions |
| Data, abort and recovery plans | Check valid execution and recovery | An evidence-backed TRR packet |
A ready chamber is not a ready thermal test
Illustrative engineering example.
A thermal campaign has a reserved facility and an approved temperature profile. Article identity, a critical sensor and abort authority are not yet resolved.
Procedure TP-14 rev C names firmware F3; article SN-06 runs F4.
Chamber calibrated; instrument S2 certificate expired and no current result supplied.
Acceptance limits controlled in REQ-T; abort limit references [TBD].
Raw-data storage and timestamps defined; abort authority not assigned.| Review question | Available evidence | Finding | Required action / owner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Article applicability | SN-06 F4 versus procedure F3 | Configuration mismatch needs disposition | Verification owner checks F3 → F4 effect and approves intended article baseline |
| Critical instrumentation | S2 lacks current calibration evidence | Validity of its measured quantity unresolved | Instrumentation owner supplies current calibration or a validated replacement |
| Abort conditions | Limit [TBD]; authority absent | Test-control gap for planned execution | Test and safety owners define limits, authority and response before running |
| Data capture | Raw-data location, channels and timestamp basis defined | Available plan covers the supplied data needs | Perform the documented acquisition check and retain configuration record |
| Facility | Chamber calibration and profile available | Facility evidence present for stated profile | Confirm fixture/load configuration and prerequisite anomalies |
The test is not ready merely because the chamber is booked and the procedure has an approval mark. The F4 article can affect applicability; missing calibration can affect data validity; unresolved abort control affects the execution decision.
A conditional recommendation must say what must close before execution, who owns it and which evidence demonstrates closure. “Complete before test” without a criterion does not support an auditable readiness decision.
Check the exact planned execution
- Map objectives and acceptance criteria to requirements and procedure conditions.
- Compare actual article, software, facility, instruments and fixtures with the planned baseline.
- Inspect raw-data capture, time basis, calibration, anomalies, abort controls and recovery roles.
- Identify pre-execution closure evidence and route the recommendation through the project’s TRR authority.
Questions about this task
Can a TRR be passed with conditions?
Where the governing process allows it, conditions need an owner and specific closure evidence before the affected execution. Unresolved controls cannot be hidden behind a generic conditional label.
Sources and further reading
- NASA NPR 7123.1D, Appendix G: life-cycle review criteria: A NASA reference for different review purposes. Use your project’s governing review criteria.
- NASA Systems Engineering Handbook: technical assessment: Background on measures, review evidence and action resolution.
References inspected on 3 October 2026. The worked output is an authored example using the stated inputs.